What happened: The U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 24 agreed to hear arguments in the case of Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, which is focused on the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act.

Why it matters: The federal government regulates domestic waters through the Act. Because the meaning of “waters of the U.S.” has not been clearly defined by federal agencies or the courts, regulatory enforcement under the Act is inconsistent and over broad. A central issue for transportation construction is whether roadside ditches qualify for regulation. ARTBA believes they do not, and that doing so only drives up costs and delays important transportation improvements without providing environmental benefits.

What’s next: Arguments in the case are scheduled for this fall. A decision may not come until early 2023.

Related News

January 26, 2024

ARTBA Reiterates Buy America Concerns in White House Meeting

What happened: In a Jan. 25 meeting with the White House Office of…

Learn More
January 19, 2024

ARTBA Meets with White House on DBE Rule Revisions

What happened: As the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) finalizes pending revisions to…

Learn More
January 5, 2024

ARTBA, Allies Comment on Draft EPA Permit Guidance

What happened: ARTBA and its allies Dec. 27 commented on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) draft guidance…

Learn More