ARTBA and its coalition partners filed comments regarding the Environmental Protections Agency’s (EPA) draft guidance on application of the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund as it relates to discharges from point sources to jurisdictional surface water through groundwater, noting there is little (if any) direction to permitting authorities or regulated parties on what constitutes a covered discharge to navigable waters (e.g., waters of the United States (“WOTUS”) through groundwater under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).

The comments noted that EPA fails to provide needed clarity to regulators or the regulated community; creates new confusion in significant areas; and is contrary to County of Maui and the CWA.

Accordingly, the coalition requests that EPA reconsider the draft guidance in its entirety, consistent with the comments above; engage stakeholders; and repropose new draft guidance for public review and comment.

Related Resources

Coalition Comments on EPA’s Draft Meaningful Involvement in Rulemaking Policy

ARTBA and its coalition partners sent a letter encouraging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to actively engage trade associations in the rulemaking process.

Learn More

Coalition Comments on White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Environmental Justice Notice

ARTBA and its coalition partners sent a letter to the White House Office…

Learn More

Coalition Comments on OSHA Heat Standard Small Business Panel Materials

ARTBA and its coalition partners sent a letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regarding a new potential standard for Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings.

Learn More