ARTBA and its allies sent a letter to the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality saying the agency should withdraw the National Environmental Act (NEPA) Proposed Rule and modify it in accordance with these comments:

  • The Proposed Rule is written to drive policy outcomes. In so doing, the Proposed Rule exceeds the bounds of the letter and intent of NEPA.
  • The Proposed Rule fails to fulfill the specific requirements and overall purpose of the Fiscal Responsibility Act. The FRA amended NEPA to address permitting delays. The Proposed Rule would only exacerbate delays and complexity driven by new requirements that would inevitably be followed by litigation.
  • The Proposed Rule would add new requirements that would further delay and complicate reviews, including requirements that are outside the permissible bounds of the statute itself. In addition, the Proposed Rule adds a new global dimension to required environmental analysis, improperly stepping away from the statute’s focus on “present and future generations of Americans.”
  • The Proposed Rule would remove key process improvements from the 2020 NEPA rule.

Related Resources

Coalition Comments on EPA’s Draft Meaningful Involvement in Rulemaking Policy

ARTBA and its coalition partners sent a letter encouraging the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to actively engage trade associations in the rulemaking process.

Learn More

Coalition Comments on White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Environmental Justice Notice

ARTBA and its coalition partners sent a letter to the White House Office…

Learn More

Coalition Comments on EPA’s Draft Guidance for Clean Water Act Section 402 Permits

ARTBA and its coalition partners filed comments regarding the Environmental Protections Agency’s (EPA) draft guidance on application of the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund.

Learn More